One rulebook both engines read, so Claude Code and Codex follow the same standards on every job: small files, clean commit messages, no secrets printed, no AI attribution in a client's repository, plain language in everything they write. Claude Code does the writing in its own git worktree. Codex reviews the result read-only and has to end with a verdict, saved under the commit it reviewed. Your own tests run on that same commit, and the merge script refuses to touch GitHub without a clean pass on it. Turn on the review switch and it also refuses a commit without the saved ACCEPT. It merges exactly the commit that was checked. Routine work goes to the cheaper models; the expensive reasoning is kept for design, hard debugging and review, where a miss costs the most.
It is not a course, a prompt pack or a hosted service. You get readable Bash and Python, the rule text both engines load, and GUIDE.md on why each piece exists and the mistake that produced it. No AI subscription, no server, no client code and no client text is included.
Built on paid client work
The scripts enforce what GUIDE.md describes, and the guide was written from daily client work, not from a demo. Every number in it comes from my own logs, with the date it was recorded. When the guide and a script disagree, read the script.
Preview each change
The installer previews each change and asks y/N before applying it. Buyer rule content is hidden; other previews hide lines that look like secrets.
Undo it completely
Every file the installer replaces or creates goes into a private backup folder with a manifest. uninstall.sh walks that manifest in reverse and puts the old content back byte for byte.